Women, Mobile Technology & the End of the Digital Caste System

While many attendees at the Mobile World Congress have focused mainly on all the latest and greatest mobile tools, a discussion that has gone largely under the radar is the so-called “digital caste system.”  Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt said in his keynote before MWC12 that for the “aspiring majority” of five out of seven billion global citizens, “the web is still a scarce resource.”

“For most people the digital revolution has not arrived yet. Every revolution begins with a small group of people. Imagine how much better it would be with another five billion people online,” he said.  “Smartphones are part of the solution, but having a smartphone is not enough to get you online.”

The International Telecommunication Union — the U.N.’s specialized agency for information and communication technologies (ICT) — launched the Broadband Commission for Digital Development to help evaluate how to not only make mobile broadband more accessible worldwide, but also how to better incorporate such policies into the UN’s Millennium Development Goals.

Here is what they came up with:

Target 1: Making broadband policy universal. By 2015, all countries should have a national broadband plan or strategy or include broadband in their universal access/service definitions.

Target 2: Making broadband affordable. By 2015, entry-level broadband services should cost less than 5% of average monthly income.

Target 3: Connecting homes to broadband. By 2015, 40% of households in developing countries should have internet access.

Target 4: Getting people online. By 2015, internet user penetration should reach 60% worldwide, 50% in developing countries and 15% in least-developed countries.

The digital gap is particularly wider for rural women who face the barriers of poverty, illiteracy and language.  The UN General Assembly Resolution 58/146 of 2004 recognized the need to provide rural women with better ICT, which has led to the growth of UN-supported ICT programs in rural communities.

There is significant evidence of how this resolution has improved the lives of many women, particularly in Latin America.  According to Martin Hilbert, researcher at the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, the programs help women become leaders in their communities, by allowing them to search for jobs, access education through online trainings and software, and increase their income.  “ICTs are a tool to fight discrimination against women in a holistic way,” he said.

Women accessing mobile technology can also become citizen journalists in their communities.  Mobile journalism played a large role in the Arab Spring.  Yemen’s Nadia Abdullah became an unlikely reporter covering events in her country.

“I didn’t imagine that my father, brother or the family would accept that I go out and do an interview on camera” Abdullah said to Voice of America. “This was almost impossible to do because of the norms and traditions. They are closed and conservative traditions. It is not proper for a woman to appear in public.”

Eventually with the approval of her family, Abdullah used an amateur video camera to document events throughout Sanaa, ranging from crackdowns by government troops to a man cradling the dead body of a loved one.  She not only helped to topple Yemen’s long time ruler, but she is now also seriously pursuing a journalism career.

“With a camera and a picture,” she said, “you can silence anyone.”

#SupportYrMedia = Journalism for the 99%

With the media landscape seemingly becoming more corporate-owned, many independent media outlets are having a hard time staying above water financially.  Even with the apparent freedoms the Internet presents, recent challenges such as the failed AT&T/T-Mobile merger and the SOPA/PIPA congressional measures have given a glimpse into what suppression of free speech could look like, especially for independent content producers.  Many supporters believe that independently owned journalism is the true representative of the so-called “99 percent,” as many mainstream media outlets only cover news that is supportive of corporate interest.

Dozens of groups are organizing Support Your Media Day – “a one-day virtual fundraiser that encourages our communities to contribute to independent media organizations through a single online giving platform on Feb 15, 2012.”  The fundraiser is being coordinated by The Media Consortium, a national network of over 50 leading, progressive independent media outlets.

“Independent media is vital to democracy and will play a critical role in the 2012 election year. Support Your Media Day is a chance for communities to stand up and support the media for the 99%,” says Jo Ellen Kaiser, Executive Director of The Media Consortium. “This day is also a critical opportunity for our members to target new donors, strengthen the TMC community, and experiment with a new revenue generation strategies in a low-risk environment.”

Participating media outlets will be able create pages on the Support Your Media website and solicit donations from their supporters using social media tools.  Throughout the day, TMC will offer ten US$1,000 matching grant prizes to participating outlets that complete a variety of tasks, such as the outlet with most creative donor page and the first outlet to get over US$10,000 in donations.  The Media Consortium partnered with Razoo, an online platform that simplifies giving for nonprofits.  According to a statement, “Razoo helped create two similar days in Minnesota, netting US$24 million in donations for 4,000 nonprofits.”

So if you want to support independent media and keep free speech alive, don’t forget to donate here for this worthy cause!

How Technology Affects The Economy & Human Rights

A recent New York Times article puts the issues of labor rights, innovation and the future of the American economy on the table.  Like many other American-based tech companies, Apple employs foreign workers to manufacture its products.  As a matter of fact, “almost all of the 70 million iPhones, 30 million iPads and 59 million other products Apple sold last year were manufactured overseas,” according to the article.  Apple employs 43,000 workers in the United States; however, there are many more Apple contractors worldwide, including 700,000 people who actually engineer and assemble iPods, iPads, iPhones and other “iThings.”

Apple and other tech companies claim to send business overseas because America is not producing enough people who are capable of doing the jobs at the speed and efficiency needed to compete in the global market today.  However, human rights advocates claim that these companies are looking for the cheapest way to create products while making more money for themselves at the expense of foreign workers.  With more NAFTA-like free trade agreements, such as the South Korea FTA, getting passed by the US Congress, even more jobs will only be shipped overseas.

…One former executive described how the company relied upon a Chinese factory to revamp iPhone manufacturing just weeks before the device was due on shelves. Apple had redesigned the iPhone’s screen at the last minute, forcing an assembly line overhaul. New screens began arriving at the plant near midnight.

A foreman immediately roused 8,000 workers inside the company’s dormitories, according to the executive. Each employee was given a biscuit and a cup of tea, guided to a workstation and within half an hour started a 12-hour shift fitting glass screens into beveled frames. Within 96 hours, the plant was producing over 10,000 iPhones a day.

“The speed and flexibility is breathtaking,” the executive said. “There’s no American plant that can match that.”…

Apple works with Foxconn Technology, a firm that ” assembles an estimated 40 percent of the world’s consumer electronics for customers like Amazon, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Motorola, Nintendo, Nokia, Samsung and Sony.”  Apple assembles its products in the Chinese assembly plant “Foxconn City.”

“[Foxconn] could hire 3,000 people overnight,” said Jennifer Rigoni, who was Apple’s worldwide supply demand manager until 2010, but declined to discuss specifics of her work. “What U.S. plant can find 3,000 people overnight and convince them to live in dorms?”

Did we also mention that Apple admitted to worsening child labor issues and employee suicides in its Chinese factories.

Here are our questions:

1.  Should American-based tech firms be obligated to provide more good jobs (meaning decent wages, benefits etc) to American-based workers, especially during a down economy?

2. Or should the pursuit of the “American dream” and the virtues of capitalism go where an American business can make money anywhere in the world?

3. Why isn’t America taking innovation and creating a job force competitive enough for the impending global market more seriously?

4.  If jobs do go overseas, what is the company’s obligation to provide good jobs for its foreign employees?

5.  Should Americans protest companies not supporting the American economy and/or their unethical employment practices overseas?

We think the last question would be hard for most Americans.  How likely will they dump their iThings to protest Apple?  But then again, maybe a little protest could at least inspire a larger conversation.

How Online Video Has Changed The Way Race Is Discussed Today

Today Americans will mark the birthday of the late civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr with a series of memorial breakfasts, panel discussions and workshops on how U.S. race relations have evolved since his assassination.  Most would say that there have been many improvements.  According to a recent Gallup poll, “more Americans believe U.S. race relations have gotten better rather than worse with Barack Obama’s election as president.”

However, recent events such as the controversies around President Obama’s birth certificate and new U.S. television program “All-American Muslim” would suggest otherwise.  The surge in social media allows anyone to use the medium to combat racial and ethnic stereotyping and discrimination.  With the use of online video specifically, more people are using innovative storytelling tactics to start these discussions.  Currently on YouTube, there is a series of funny, yet thought-provoking videos called “Sh*t Girls Say” made by both amateur and professional videographers addressing racial attitudes, like the above video made by Iraqi actress Tamara Dhia.

Another video in the series that has taken off is “Sh*t White Girls Say…to Black Girls” by New York video blogger Franchesca Ramsey, which is based on comments made to her by other white females.  Ramsey said in a recent interview that she was hoping to get high viewer hits at first.

“I saw other videos in the series become popular online,” she said.  “I thought they were funny, but I couldn’t relate to them or see myself in them.”

This video garnered five million hits in one week, and sparked a larger online discussion.  Ramsey says she has received both positive and negative emails from others who wanted to discuss the meaning behind the video.

Filmmaker Issa Rae also felt that she wasn’t represented as a black woman in mainstream media.  After reading yet another article about the lack of African-Americans onscreen, she decided to be the media and do her own online webisodes about being “awkward,” and, thus, the name of her series “The Mis-Adventures of Awkward Black Girl.”

“This is the future, especially for minority content producers on the Internet,” she said in a recent CNN interview.  “This is the way to go.  There is no gatekeeper.  You can release whatever content you want.  I think this is the best route to take, honestly.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.