Final Thoughts on the Year in Digital Activism 2011

A milestone year in digital activism is finally coming to a close.  A few weeks ago we asked you what your thoughts were on the best acts of protest this year.  Below are the winners of our contest who will be receiving a Flip UltraHD Video Camera.

“The love in my heart I felt for my brothers in Tunisia was amazing.  Watching from far away, I felt I was right there with my brothers in the streets [on YouTube].  The images were powerful because it showed the frustration of the people and their determination to see political change immediately.  I am sad everyday that Mohamed Bouazizi is no longer with us and died the way he did, but I will always be grateful for him for starting the revolution for change.  Mohamed must remind us that it only takes one person to get the ball rolling.”

- Nassir El-Bahri, Beirut, Lebanon

“I was incredibly touched by the protests this year on behalf of the socially and economically disenfranchised.  When I learned about the story of Troy Davis, I was so profoundly touched by his story, that I told my friends and family on Twitter and Facebook and my blog to sign the e-petition to keep him alive.  It was the first time in my life I felt motivated to be an online activist because I knew deep down in my heart that he wasn’t guilty of the crime.  And I think watching the Arab Spring from my TV and following it on Twitter showed me how simple it was to stand up against injustice.”

- Monique Lynn Johnson, Mobile, Alabama, USA

“I was laid off and have been unemployed for two years, and I felt really angry at my government and big corporations right now.  So there was something about the Occupy Wall Street movement that moved me.  I visited the tent city in my area a few times on my way to my temp job and talked to people there who were also like me.  I wasn’t able to camp out there, but I stayed in touch with everything going on there on Live Stream, YouTube and Facebook, and felt like I was there in spirit.  I also talked with others online about my predicament, and felt I was doing my part in the smallest way I could.”

-Drew Fatton, Vancouver, Canada

“I am excited to see what happens on the Korean peninsula now that Kim Jong-Il has passed.  A major protest this year that went under the radar was the mass anti-FTA protest in South Korea.  I am originally from Seoul, but currently go to university in Washington DC, when protests began.  I was amazed to see such little attention the American media gave to KORUS because in my opinion, it is the worst thing in US trade policy since NAFTA.  Many of my Korean friends are worried about how the policy will affect both Koreans and Americans negatively in the long run.  However, when the video footage of the thousands of people protesting the FTA in Seoul got on YouTube, I retweeted them to my American friends to let them know how US policy decisions affect others around the world.  My American friends were shocked because they didn’t even know about the FTA.  This year in social media and revolution has really opened many eyes.  I want to see the next online battle go to North Korea.”

- Esther Lee, Washington D.C & Seoul, South Korea

North Korea: The Next Social Media Revolution?

With the recent death of Kim Jong-Il, many analysts have begun to discuss the future of North Korea.  Reportedly Kim’s 27-year-old son Kim Jong-un will be his successor.  Among the many concerns with the totalitarian regime is its blatant lack of free speech and human rights.  However, with this sudden changing of the guard, is there a window of opportunity for radical social change?  Despite the disturbing images of “crying” North Koreans mourning Kim’s death, there might be possible ( and we do say this consciously) signs that the “Twitter/Facebook Revolution” can move from Egypt to North Korea.

According to Reporters Without Borders (RWB), North Korea has been ranked last or second from last (with Eritrea) in their annual press freedom index for nearly a decade.  Most North Koreans are not able to freely use mobile phones or the Internet. Only the political elite and foreign tourists in Pyongyang are granted Internet and mobile access, but even that access is limited.  All media in North Korea gets its news (or propaganda) from the Korean Central News Agency.

UCLA professor Ramesh Srinivasan made some interesting points about the future of free expression in the country.

Srinivasan said Kim Jong Il recently extended “small olive branches to the rest of the world,” which possibly included greater access to technology and social media.  And here is where the “vacuum” exists.

“A vacuum may allow activists potentially within the country to reach out to the outer world,” Srinivasan said. “It may not be the government that takes the initiative, but instead underground factions within North Korea who reach out to the rest of the world. This may influence the establishment of social networks with other parts of the world.”

In the Reporters Without Borders report North Korea: Frontiers of Censorship, “the growth of an underground economy and the permeability of the Sino-Korean border are two key factors for the prospect of a gradual opening-up in North Korea.”  The report says that North Korean defectors are sending CDs, DVDs and USB flash drives with political content about democracy and human rights from South Korea and the Chinese border via balloons to North Korea.  Sometimes radio sets are sent on these balloons.  North Korean defectors have also launched shortwave radio stations aimed at broadcasting to North Korea, like Free North Korea Radio and Open Radio for North Korea, which are regularly jammed by Kim’s regime.

Dissident journalists also risk their lives to get information out of North Korea.  Rimjin-gang, “a North Korean magazine founded jointly by the Japanese journalist Ishimaru Jiro and a North Korean journalist who uses the pseudonym of Lee Jun, uses information and photos obtained from a network of North Korean journalists.” In addition, “the Associated Press announced in June that it had signed a series of accords with North Korea that will increase its access to the country.”

Although there are many North Koreans who may not have even heard of the Internet, clearly the network of dissidents working to establish more freedoms are at an opportune time in history to take advantage of the “vacuum” and to create a revolution.

Library 2.0: Supporting Underserved Communities

With the advent of e-books, audio books, Kindles and other devices that make the art of reading a digital experience, many wonder with the declining number of bookstores, what will happen to public libraries.  For those of us who are lucky to live in places where a library exists, they are not only spaces to read and lend out books, but they also act as community meeting spaces.

However, the increase in digital media has also been compounded with the current economic downturn, which has contributed to the budget cuts and closings of many public libraries around the United States.  Even more unfortunate is that many of these endangered public libraries are serving marginalized populations in rural and inner city areas.

Recently, we had a chance to participate in the Digital Diversity Summit, where there was much discussion about the future of public libraries, and specifically how to keep them relevant.  Jessamyn West, a Vermont  library technologist and am a community manager at MetaFilter.com, said that many librarians, especially in underserved areas, are not up to speed on how to help library users.

“Librarians are trained to do research, not in how to use new technologies,” West said.  “Libraries are also exhausted because they are now being used as social service centers.”

It made us think about the future of public libraries – library 2.0 – in marginalized communities.  How can these institutions not only have a life once physical, printed literature is buried for good, but also be relevant and useful to its clients?

How about turning public libraries into community media centers?  Many libraries already function in this manner already, but maybe it’s time to take this idea further.

Here are our ideas:

1. Provide digital training for librarians: According to the American Library Association, libraries serve 97 percent of the American population, so it is important that librarians be able to help users with as many digital platforms as possible.

2. Provide digital training for library users: Instead of closing down libraries, convert them into community media centers, where users can not only use computers with Internet access for free, but also be trained on how to use e-readers, download free e-books and audio books and learn how to better use the Internet.  In our “perfect world,” all kids should be able to go to a library and get their first experience with digital literacy at their local library.

3. Truly make libraries social service centers as well: Since librarians are exhausted by the many demands of their users, there may be a need to have a discussion about expanding the types of people who work in libraries, like having job placement experts, multilingual specialists, legal services, voter registration experts and other service workers.

4. A nationalized digital public library: One issue that has been up for discussion in recent years is the development of a nationalized digital public library.  Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society was recently awarded $5 million to go forward on their plans to develop the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA).

“…The DPLA would essentially create a unified repository for all the digital collections of libraries, museums, archives, and anyone else that had digital content of value that they wanted to share with the public.  There would be standards for adding data to the repository as well as for accessing data from it.  The repository would be secure, redundant, and scalable…”

Read more about the benefits of Library 2.0 here.

What Was The Best Act of Digital Activism In 2011?

The year 2011 will go down in history as one where digital activism was king around the world.  Whether it was  Egyptian protesters tweeting in Tahrir Square, South Koreans using YouTube to proclaim their anger at the US-Korea Free Trade Agreement, Syrians posting Facebook updates to organize protests, anti-death penalty activists signing e-petitions in support of Troy Davis, or Occupy Wall Street organizers live-streaming rallies in Zucotti Park on their mobile phones, the revolution is certainly not being televised.  We also saw the rise (and potential fall) of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and how telecommunications/Internet policy can affect a much discussed merger between AT&T and T-Mobile and the risks around the Stop Online Piracy Act.

We want to know what are your thoughts on this year in online organizing.  What were your favorite causes and digital strategies?  Were there acts of digital activism that went under the radar this year that deserve more recognition?  Drop us a line at info (at) globalwireonline (dot) org with your thoughts by Dec. 23 and not only will the best ideas be featured on this site, but also those featured authors will get a free Flip UltraHD Video Camera – a pretty cool holiday gift from us to you.

Happy Holidays!

Talia, Marjane, Philip, Maria and our intern Preeti

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.