What You Need to Know About the Stop Online Piracy Act

Recent events related to the Arab Spring have made many living in democratic societies take for granted their right to free online expression.  However, Americans might have a very rude awakening very soon if the U.S. government has its way.  Congress is actually debating a law that would give them the power to censor Internet content.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), also known as H.R.3261, was introduced recently by Texas Congressman Lamar Smith and a bipartisan group of 12 initial co-sponsors.

From OpenCongress:

This bill would establish a system for taking down websites that the Justice Department determines to be dedicated to copyright infringement. The DoJ or the copyright owner would be able to commence a legal action against any site they deem to have “only limited purpose or use other than infringement,” and the DoJ would be allowed to demand that search engines, social networking sites and domain name services block access to the targeted site. It would also make unauthorized web streaming of copyrighted content a felony with a possible penalty up to five years in prison. This bill combines two separate Senate bills — S.968 and S.978 — into one big House bill.

Proponents of the bill say “it protects the intellectual property market, including the resultant revenue and jobs, and is necessary to bolster enforcement of copyright laws especially against foreign websites.”  Those supporters include the Motion Picture Association of America, the Recording Industry Association of America, Netflix, AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

However, opponents say that the bill will not only censor expression, but it will also stifle job creation and innovation.  The many opponents include Internet companies like Twitter, Google and Facebook, as well as human rights groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Reporters Without Borders and Human Rights Watch.

From a social justice perspective:

…This bill could also have a huge impact on the work of human rights advocates and whistleblowers who depend on online tools to protect their anonymity and speak out against injustice. Platforms created to provide anonymity software to human rights activists across the world, as well as next generation WikiLeaks-style whistleblower sites, could be major casualties of this bill—all in the name of increasing Hollywood’s bottom line…

So to put it simply, the Arab Spring would have happened differently – if it happened at all – if social media tools like YouTube and Twitter were not available for use by the protesters.  We probably wouldn’t have known the truth about Guantanamo Bay without the help of WikiLeaks.  Most people probably wouldn’t have even known about the causes around Troy Davis and Bank Transfer Day without the help of online petitioning.

Most importantly, the business operations for Global Wire Associates are threatened if such a bill is passed.  This bill undermines all the work we do with many activists worldwide.  Imagine the many people who will suddenly be silenced because they were speaking out against injustice.

If you live in the United State, please contact your congressman, asking them to oppose the bill.  You can also make your opposition to the bill known publicly here on this online petition.

#OccupytheHood Reaches Out to Underserved Communities

For the last month, the world has been engaged by the grassroots uprising of the Occupy Wall Street movement.  However, there were immediate complaints that there was a lack of activists of color in the crowds.  In the last few days alone, activists of color have started their own movement using Facebook and Twitter, and their followers have grown exponentially.

From Al-Jazeera:

…Occupy The Hood was born out of a need that we saw to try to get people of colour involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement – not just in New York, but all around the world – to get involved in the general assemblies where decisions are made.

Without everybody, it’s not a true representation of the 99 per cent. I don’t know if the doors are being closed to people of colour, but this does involve us – come out and get involved in it. It’s not a white fight, it’s a people’s fight. We can’t be counted if we’re not there – if we’re not present to be counted…

“Occupy the Hood Boston” had their first gathering on Oct. 21 – the first gathering of its kind in the country. Of course, our Talia Whyte was there to record the beginning of this movement above.

#BannedBooksWeek Takes It To The (Digital) Streets

Banned Books Week, an annual campaign that celebrates free speech and draws attentions to banned and challenged books worldwide, is one of our favorite times of the year.  While the physical, printed book has one foot in the grave due in part to Amazon.com, audiobooks and e-readers, the intellectual property inside many of these legendary books will continue to have a lasting impression.

This year the American Library Association reminds us that intellectual property and freedom lives on virtually and has taken their campaign to the new frontier of social media.  Supporters can participate in discussions on free expression on its Facebook page and Twitter hashtag #BannedBooksWeek, as well as find offline discussion groups at local bookstores and libraries.

People can also go to the campaign’s YouTube channel to not only view videos by people around the United States reading controversial books, but they can also either submit their own video of up to two minutes or a description of a local book challenge of up to three minutes.  Supporters can also go to Flickr to view and/or upload photos expressing their thoughts on this awareness week.

But the coolest part of the campaign is a Google Map that shows censorship attempts around the country in the last four years.  If the map is any indication, the United States still has a long way to go on protecting the First Amendment.

A Montana library director @bmmsben pointed out the famous Mark Twain quote on Twitter “Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it.”

What the Troy Davis Case Reveals About Digital Activism

Georgia death row inmate Troy Davis was executed Sep. 21 after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an 11th-hour request to block the execution.  Davis was convicted of killing off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in 1989.  It was a somber conclusion to a recently launched social media campaign led by Amnesty International and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), which garnered international support for Davis.

While the online campaign to save Davis’ life failed, there are some digital activism ideas to take away from this situation.

1. Social Media wasn’t used correctly in this case.  Flip the Media’s Jonathan Cunningham made some great points about the lack of online clout:

…Many of the people retweeting petitions and posting notices on their social media accounts had never heard of Davis until a week ago — or less. Reading and signing a physical petition, or writing a parole board takes effort and research at the very least. Retweeting a petition for clemency in a capital murder case only takes dexterity in one finger as you click a button. Online activism, while noble and potentially powerful, typically involves the short-winded enthusiasm of the uninformed. If Troy Davis is the triggerman and he’s guiltier than sin, there would still be just as many wide-eyed folks on Twitter sending around links to save his life today. Frankly, that’s uneducated and unwise at the very least and potentially dangerous at the extreme…

2. Old school organizations finally learn new tricks.  After much complaining by many black bloggers, the NAACP has possibly found a way to be relevant to younger African-Americans through social media, while still upholding the values and traditions the venerable organization is best known for.

3. Social media isn’t always the cause of riots.  Unlike the recent riots in London, followed by Prime Minister David Cameron’s now recanted desire to ban social media, riots didn’t break out in black neighborhoods throughout the United States in light of the execution.  In the days leading up the execution date, many people online wondered if Twitter was purposely censoring any mention of Davis and hashtags #TooMuchDoubt or #TroyDavis from trending.  Some of us in the office speculated that if Twitter was in fact censoring, they were doing it to possibly prevent potential rioting.

4. Maybe more people will pay attention to more serious issues.  While all the retweets and rallies may not have saved Davis’ life, digital activism shows that it could be a tool to mobilize people to think about things more pressing than who “celebutante” Kim Kardashian is dating or who will appear on “Dancing with the Stars.”  Capital punishment is a very complex issue on many levels that needs to be addressed better by law enforcement, elected officials and the general public.  Our only complaint is that Amnesty International and the NAACP should have started a stronger social media campaign months ago instead of a week before the execution.  Not only would the general public have been better educated about Davis’ case, but possibly – just possibly – Davis would be alive today.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.